But they have a larger number of people contributing and the facilities are often used by surrounding villages so why should we pay more??
We could argue for weeks about the relative fairness of the spend - those in town getting more facilities on their doorstep, those in remoter areas getting fewer but more costly services etc, etc, But the fact is that public spending is not fair, it never has been and never will be.
But they have a larger number of people contributing and the facilities are often used by surrounding villages so why should we pay more??
Some of the money they get most also be down to the responsibilities that the town council has. For instance, Newbury Council runs quite a few of the labour intensive items Victoria park for instance, Shaw cemetery and Newbury market. They also run a Mayor which probably is not an expensive item but nevertheless is yet another cost. I'm not sure if the Town Hall maintenance is down to NTC.
Some of the money they get most also be down to the responsibilities that the town council has. For instance, Newbury Council runs quite a few of the labour intensive items Victoria park for instance, Shaw cemetery and Newbury market. They also run a Mayor which probably is not an expensive item but nevertheless is yet another cost. I'm not sure if the Town Hall maintenance is down to NTC.
Looking at the budget it seems that Shaw Cemetery and the Market make money - no excuse there for raising the precept.